Speeding is one of the most common ways for Americans to break the
law. Drive the speed limit on the highway around here and you’ll
typically be the slowest car on the road. How much over the speed
limit is customary varies regionally, but drivers often expect cops to
ignore them at 5-15 mph over.
Overall, I think this is a pretty bad situation. It gets people used
to ignoring laws, people who scrupulously follow the law are often at
higher risk (and cause higher risk to those around them) than if they
went along with traffic, driverless cars go awkwardly slow, some risk
of selective enforcement, confusing for travelers, etc. How can we
get out of this?
If we just started strictly enforcing the current limits we’d have a
mess: it’s too big a behavior change to push all at once so you’d see
even more dangerous variance in speeds than today, and it’s unclear we
actually want people driving the posted speeds. It also wouldn’t work
well to raise the limit to the speed people are mostly going, since
many people would assume they can then go an extra 5-15mph on top of
that.
Instead we could take inspiration from Brazil
and introduce a parallel system of maximum speeds:
Initially this has no legal effect, and just makes the existing amount
of leeway more legible. On a 55mph road where people normally drive
60-65 and the police don’t start ticketing until you’re more than
10mph over, the signs would say both “speed limit 55” and “max 65″.
These would be rolled out gradually, in consultation with traffic
engineers and the people responsible for enforcement.
As they roll out, you adjust enforcement to match. Put up speed
cameras set to the maximum in many places, and in other places have
police enforce the max strictly after each sign is put up. Traveling
above the limit but below the maximum becomes effectively allowed,
since there’s no enforcement.
Once the rollout is complete you overhaul the laws around speeding to
make the maximum the legal limit, and adjust rules that are set
relative to the old limit to still make sense. For example, if you
previously gave only low fines for going 58 in a 55 zone, and in
practice never issued them, while you gave high fines for going 68,
you would still want the higher fine for going 68 in a “max 65” zone.
The goal is to bring the law in line with behavior, but otherwise keep
the status quo.
At this point you could consider removing the older lower “speed
limit” signs, but I think it’s probably worth keeping them as advice
about what speed to travel. In some cases you might raise them a bit,
knowing that with the maximum in place as a firm limit you’ll get
slightly faster speeds but lower variance.
I think there’s a path here that brings the law back in line with
driver and enforcement behavior, while otherwise essentially
maintaining the status quo. It does require new signs and some policy
tweaks, but seems on balance pretty positive to me.
Introduce a Speed Maximum
Link post
Speeding is one of the most common ways for Americans to break the law. Drive the speed limit on the highway around here and you’ll typically be the slowest car on the road. How much over the speed limit is customary varies regionally, but drivers often expect cops to ignore them at 5-15 mph over.
Overall, I think this is a pretty bad situation. It gets people used to ignoring laws, people who scrupulously follow the law are often at higher risk (and cause higher risk to those around them) than if they went along with traffic, driverless cars go awkwardly slow, some risk of selective enforcement, confusing for travelers, etc. How can we get out of this?
If we just started strictly enforcing the current limits we’d have a mess: it’s too big a behavior change to push all at once so you’d see even more dangerous variance in speeds than today, and it’s unclear we actually want people driving the posted speeds. It also wouldn’t work well to raise the limit to the speed people are mostly going, since many people would assume they can then go an extra 5-15mph on top of that.
Instead we could take inspiration from Brazil and introduce a parallel system of maximum speeds:
Initially this has no legal effect, and just makes the existing amount of leeway more legible. On a 55mph road where people normally drive 60-65 and the police don’t start ticketing until you’re more than 10mph over, the signs would say both “speed limit 55” and “max 65″. These would be rolled out gradually, in consultation with traffic engineers and the people responsible for enforcement.
As they roll out, you adjust enforcement to match. Put up speed cameras set to the maximum in many places, and in other places have police enforce the max strictly after each sign is put up. Traveling above the limit but below the maximum becomes effectively allowed, since there’s no enforcement.
Once the rollout is complete you overhaul the laws around speeding to make the maximum the legal limit, and adjust rules that are set relative to the old limit to still make sense. For example, if you previously gave only low fines for going 58 in a 55 zone, and in practice never issued them, while you gave high fines for going 68, you would still want the higher fine for going 68 in a “max 65” zone. The goal is to bring the law in line with behavior, but otherwise keep the status quo.
At this point you could consider removing the older lower “speed limit” signs, but I think it’s probably worth keeping them as advice about what speed to travel. In some cases you might raise them a bit, knowing that with the maximum in place as a firm limit you’ll get slightly faster speeds but lower variance.
I think there’s a path here that brings the law back in line with driver and enforcement behavior, while otherwise essentially maintaining the status quo. It does require new signs and some policy tweaks, but seems on balance pretty positive to me.