The judge in row 14 did not get 11⁄13, but 10⁄12, having punted on #8 by assigning 50%. This affects at least your first calculation.
Good catch. But it’s the second calculation that I find more interesting.
There is also a fair chance that that judge recognized at least one of their own entries… 9/11?
The judge in row 14 did not get 11⁄13, but 10⁄12, having punted on #8 by assigning 50%. This affects at least your first calculation.
Good catch. But it’s the second calculation that I find more interesting.
There is also a fair chance that that judge recognized at least one of their own entries… 9/11?