In the wake of GPT 3, it seems that AGI is possible. No question about that. But my question is can it be more “human” than we think? I watched an interview with Eric Elliot and GPT 3. The machine says that it can lie, I don’t think it is impossible for a machine to lie (as far as I know, but I could be wrong). But then it begs the question, how many human traits will AGI pick up? And if picking up negative human traits is a consequence of AGI itself how “general” do we want to make it?
I am questioning the purpose of making AGI not because I fear it, I just don’t understand where the direction of this entire concept is going. Any references to the discussions and ethics regarding this matter will be very appreciated.
[Question] Will AGI have “human” flaws?
In the wake of GPT 3, it seems that AGI is possible. No question about that. But my question is can it be more “human” than we think? I watched an interview with Eric Elliot and GPT 3. The machine says that it can lie, I don’t think it is impossible for a machine to lie (as far as I know, but I could be wrong). But then it begs the question, how many human traits will AGI pick up? And if picking up negative human traits is a consequence of AGI itself how “general” do we want to make it?
I am questioning the purpose of making AGI not because I fear it, I just don’t understand where the direction of this entire concept is going. Any references to the discussions and ethics regarding this matter will be very appreciated.