I’m guessing the reviewer just had a particular axe to grind—he likes Freud and wanted to argue that Freudian ideas shouldn’t be seen as low-status.
I don’t think the article is nearly clever enough to exploit the reader like that, although it would certainly explain the, er, Freudian slip in the second paragraph.
I’m guessing the reviewer just had a particular axe to grind—he likes Freud and wanted to argue that Freudian ideas shouldn’t be seen as low-status.
I don’t think the article is nearly clever enough to exploit the reader like that, although it would certainly explain the, er, Freudian slip in the second paragraph.