I was quite surprised to see myself cited as “liking the broader category that QACI is in”—I think this claim may technically be true for some definition of “likes” and “broader category”, but tries to imply a higher level of endorsement to the casual reader than is factual.
I don’t have a very good understanding of QACI and therefore have no particularly strong opinions on QACI. It seems quite different from the kinds of alignment approaches I think about.
I was quite surprised to see myself cited as “liking the broader category that QACI is in”—I think this claim may technically be true for some definition of “likes” and “broader category”, but tries to imply a higher level of endorsement to the casual reader than is factual.
I don’t have a very good understanding of QACI and therefore have no particularly strong opinions on QACI. It seems quite different from the kinds of alignment approaches I think about.