Against having an LLM extract some important highlights- if doing highlights is the way to go I think whoever nominated the piece for the review can find the highlights?
This changes it from a 10 second operation to a several minute operation, which makes it prohibitively expensive to do it for a lot of posts.
Curious to hear more about what feels off about LLM extract. I do think this is something they’re actually pretty good at (and you can always edit it afterwards)
I imagine two people are talking and one says “oh, I think you should read this essay, here’s the link!” and the second asks “oh, what’s it about? Any good quotes?”
If the first doesn’t have an answer to that, then it feels like a weird recommendation? I guess that’s the second stage of, where people review them.
Yeah. It needs a review to pass to the third stage so this should have come up by then. The first stage is “are there a number of people who are like ‘oh yeah that post, that was important’ and upvote it?”
This changes it from a 10 second operation to a several minute operation, which makes it prohibitively expensive to do it for a lot of posts.
Curious to hear more about what feels off about LLM extract. I do think this is something they’re actually pretty good at (and you can always edit it afterwards)
I imagine two people are talking and one says “oh, I think you should read this essay, here’s the link!” and the second asks “oh, what’s it about? Any good quotes?”
If the first doesn’t have an answer to that, then it feels like a weird recommendation? I guess that’s the second stage of, where people review them.
Yeah. It needs a review to pass to the third stage so this should have come up by then. The first stage is “are there a number of people who are like ‘oh yeah that post, that was important’ and upvote it?”