It shouldn’t be hard to explain that, if God knows at least what is in the Encyclopedia >Brittanica, God has at least enough complexity to store that information.
Except that the library of all possible books includes the Encyclopedia Brittanica but is far simpler.
Except that the library of all possible books includes the Encyclopedia Brittanica but is far simpler.
Presumably, God can also distinguish between “the set of books with useful information” and “the set of books containing only nonsense”. That is quite complex indeed.
I’m afraid I wasn’t clear. I am not arguing that “god” is simple or that it explains anything. I’m just saying that god’s knowledge is compressible into an intelligent generator (AI).
The source code isn’t likely to be 10 lines, but then again, it doesn’t have to include the Encyclopedia of Brittanica to tell you everything that the encyclopedia can once it grows up and learns.
F=m*a is enough to let you draw out all physically possible trajectories from the set of all trajectories, and it is still rather simple.
Except that the library of all possible books includes the Encyclopedia Brittanica but is far simpler.
Presumably, God can also distinguish between “the set of books with useful information” and “the set of books containing only nonsense”. That is quite complex indeed.
I’m afraid I wasn’t clear. I am not arguing that “god” is simple or that it explains anything. I’m just saying that god’s knowledge is compressible into an intelligent generator (AI).
The source code isn’t likely to be 10 lines, but then again, it doesn’t have to include the Encyclopedia of Brittanica to tell you everything that the encyclopedia can once it grows up and learns.
F=m*a is enough to let you draw out all physically possible trajectories from the set of all trajectories, and it is still rather simple.