What sense of valuable are you using here? I’ve seen very little evidence in my interactions with the education system that being good at teaching is highly valued either in terms of direct financial rewards or career prospects.
Effective tutoring would be very valuable to rich parents. Perhaps passively building your reputation wouldn’t work; self-promotion would be necessary.
Public school teachers are well compensated overall over an entire career (including pension), although I doubt the job is very fun, and you’re right that the rewards are in no way contingent on actually teaching well.
Effective tutoring would be very valuable to rich parents.
Are rich parents able to distinguish effective tutors? In my experience they largely hire based on elite education. Plus, most of their “tutoring” time is really guarding the child to make sure the child actually does homework. But there are also non-rich parents. I don’t think that DAS should have any trouble getting hired and keeping tutoring positions for $20 or maybe $50 hourly, if he can find parents who want a tutor. This is a very different skill and I think the main determinant of people actually tutoring. (ETA: I seem to have missed JG’s second sentence. Sorry.)
I poked around a little earlier today, and found a few sites that do paid online tutoring. This one was the most open about hiring new tutors of the ones I looked at. Their FAQ says that their most active Chemistry tutors earn $800-$1600/month. Even given that that’s an upper bound, it may be worth looking into. (I lived pretty comfortably on $1200/month last year, with about Crono’s expectation of lifestyle, and without having someone to share bills with.)
Most people find teaching (well) to be difficult. If you’re good at it, then that’s quite valuable.
What sense of valuable are you using here? I’ve seen very little evidence in my interactions with the education system that being good at teaching is highly valued either in terms of direct financial rewards or career prospects.
Effective tutoring would be very valuable to rich parents. Perhaps passively building your reputation wouldn’t work; self-promotion would be necessary.
Public school teachers are well compensated overall over an entire career (including pension), although I doubt the job is very fun, and you’re right that the rewards are in no way contingent on actually teaching well.
Are rich parents able to distinguish effective tutors? In my experience they largely hire based on elite education. Plus, most of their “tutoring” time is really guarding the child to make sure the child actually does homework. But there are also non-rich parents. I don’t think that DAS should have any trouble getting hired and keeping tutoring positions for $20 or maybe $50 hourly, if he can find parents who want a tutor. This is a very different skill and I think the main determinant of people actually tutoring. (ETA: I seem to have missed JG’s second sentence. Sorry.)
I poked around a little earlier today, and found a few sites that do paid online tutoring. This one was the most open about hiring new tutors of the ones I looked at. Their FAQ says that their most active Chemistry tutors earn $800-$1600/month. Even given that that’s an upper bound, it may be worth looking into. (I lived pretty comfortably on $1200/month last year, with about Crono’s expectation of lifestyle, and without having someone to share bills with.)