Replace AI with nuclear reactors.
Today if you have time, knowledge you can actually build one in your own home.
Why hasn’t your home town blown yet, or better yet why didn’t you do it ?
If AI development is closed what on what basis are you trusting the end project ? Are you seriously going to trust vested interests in creating a closed source safe AI ? What happens if people are actually trying to progress towards safe AI and something goes wrong because idk Murphy or something ? It’s better if it’s open and we keep as many eyes on it as possible.
OpenAI currently isn’t doing anything remotely close to what you’re talking about ? What the hell is the point of your whole post ?
I apologise beforehand for use of unproper words and somewhat unintelligible phrases but I feel like this describes best the way I want to express myself.
Only if you build one based on fission. Even then you can pgp/tor/vpn (all at the same time, shred the keys after the transaction or burn the machine) it up if you have a credible source which probably doesn’t exist.
It’s been a long time since PS2s were export limited because the chips were potentially useful for making cruise missiles. Getting access to compute is cheap and unadversarial in a way that getting access to fissile material is not.
Getting access to compute is cheap and unadversarial in a way that getting access to fissile material is not.
High-performance compute is mostly limited by power/energy use these days, so if your needs are large enough (which they are, if you’re doing things like simulating a human brain—whoops sorry, I meant a “neural network!”—in order to achieve ‘AGI’ and perhaps superintelligence), getting access to compute requires getting access to fissile material. (Or comparable sources of energy, anyway.)
Replace AI with nuclear reactors. Today if you have time, knowledge you can actually build one in your own home. Why hasn’t your home town blown yet, or better yet why didn’t you do it ?
If AI development is closed what on what basis are you trusting the end project ? Are you seriously going to trust vested interests in creating a closed source safe AI ? What happens if people are actually trying to progress towards safe AI and something goes wrong because idk Murphy or something ? It’s better if it’s open and we keep as many eyes on it as possible.
OpenAI currently isn’t doing anything remotely close to what you’re talking about ? What the hell is the point of your whole post ?
I apologise beforehand for use of unproper words and somewhat unintelligible phrases but I feel like this describes best the way I want to express myself.
No, you can’t.
You’ll probably find yourself sitting in a Federal prison before the first bits of fissile materials show up on your doorstep.
On that note: Wasn’t there a high school group who essentially manufactured a nuclear bomb casing without the critical exploding and fissioning bits?
Haven’t heard about it, but what’s special about that casing? It sound like you can make a metal tube and go “this is an ICBM casing!”
Only if you build one based on fission. Even then you can pgp/tor/vpn (all at the same time, shred the keys after the transaction or burn the machine) it up if you have a credible source which probably doesn’t exist.
You are confusing “acquire theoretical knowledge of how to build” with “actually build one”.
What are my alternatives for the home reactor, fusion? X-D
I tend to think you’re right, but how is OP not doing the same thing when it comes to AI ?
It’s been a long time since PS2s were export limited because the chips were potentially useful for making cruise missiles. Getting access to compute is cheap and unadversarial in a way that getting access to fissile material is not.
High-performance compute is mostly limited by power/energy use these days, so if your needs are large enough (which they are, if you’re doing things like simulating a human brain—whoops sorry, I meant a “neural network!”—in order to achieve ‘AGI’ and perhaps superintelligence), getting access to compute requires getting access to fissile material. (Or comparable sources of energy, anyway.)
Things are easier to build in cyberspace where all you need is bits and you never run out of them.
But in general I’m not a fan of the OP approach.