Therefore Bayesianism does not describe the way that we actually find out true things. I think this is a pretty compelling criticism of Bayes, does anyone have a stock answer?
It isn’t a theory about human psychology in the first place.
Epistemologies are theories about how knowledge is created.
Humans create knowledge.
If you want to be an epistemology, address the problem of how they do it.
Humans do all kinds of things badly. They are becoming obsolete.
For a neater perspective that is more likely to stand the test of time, it is better to consider how machines create knowledge.
It isn’t a theory about human psychology in the first place.
Epistemologies are theories about how knowledge is created.
Humans create knowledge.
If you want to be an epistemology, address the problem of how they do it.
Humans do all kinds of things badly. They are becoming obsolete.
For a neater perspective that is more likely to stand the test of time, it is better to consider how machines create knowledge.