You don’t need any complicated relationship between the RH and the number of observers. Just consider the very simple “possibility” that 1+0 = 1E500. Worlds in which this is true have lots more observers than those where 1+0 = 1 :-)
That’s the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.
I was considering mentioning this too. What if 1+0=3^^^^^^^^^^^3. Then there are really definafely lots of observers.
Well, you still need cogito ergo sum to reach that conclusion. Though I’ve no idea how to make anthropic reasoning work without it :-)
You don’t need any complicated relationship between the RH and the number of observers. Just consider the very simple “possibility” that 1+0 = 1E500. Worlds in which this is true have lots more observers than those where 1+0 = 1 :-)
That’s the funniest thing I’ve seen all day.
I was considering mentioning this too. What if 1+0=3^^^^^^^^^^^3. Then there are really definafely lots of observers.
Well, you still need cogito ergo sum to reach that conclusion. Though I’ve no idea how to make anthropic reasoning work without it :-)