For the interested: A good summary/defense of Jackson’s moral functionalism can be found in Jackson (2012), “On ethical naturalism and the philosophy of language.”
Now, should we call this a form of “moral realism”? I dunno. That’s something I’d prefer to taboo. Even famous error theorist Richard Joyce kinda agrees.
For the interested: A good summary/defense of Jackson’s moral functionalism can be found in Jackson (2012), “On ethical naturalism and the philosophy of language.”
Now, should we call this a form of “moral realism”? I dunno. That’s something I’d prefer to taboo. Even famous error theorist Richard Joyce kinda agrees.