Why do you think merely having a visceral reaction to lying (one’s own or others’; actual or hypothetical) isn’t enough?
Conditional on having that visceral reaction, what is the advantage of then becoming indignant? Or do you think that becoming indignant is identical to that visceral reaction?
Why do you think merely having a visceral reaction to lying (one’s own or others’; actual or hypothetical) isn’t enough?
Conditional on having that visceral reaction, what is the advantage of then becoming indignant? Or do you think that becoming indignant is identical to that visceral reaction?