I don’t know… you don’t have to take it in all at once. You can read just one section at a time, after all. Each section has a link to it in the summary. What is the added advantage in splitting it up?
Let’s think in consequentialist terms here. You obviously put forth a lot of useful effort, thanks for that! But realistically, it seems plausible that the material is not being presented in a way that is maximally accessible, and your post could potentially be even more awesome than it already is!
I’m not suggesting you change anything at this point, just pointing stuff out.
^ But, that can be said of too many things. I don’t find it meaningful.
e.g. ‘It’s plausible that Harry Potter has not been written in the best possible way.’
Of course it’s plausible, but the consideration of its plausibility does not contribute to making better-informed decisions. It contributes no useful information!
Right. The real question is how much the post could improve given an hour’s effort; in other words, how much improvement could you buy for an hour of labor. And I’m suggesting that you could get a pretty good deal.
This needs to be broken up into smaller, more digestible sub-articles. It’s too much to take in all at once.
I don’t know… you don’t have to take it in all at once. You can read just one section at a time, after all. Each section has a link to it in the summary. What is the added advantage in splitting it up?
I think the length works as is. (I did spread my reading out over 2 days, though.)
Let’s think in consequentialist terms here. You obviously put forth a lot of useful effort, thanks for that! But realistically, it seems plausible that the material is not being presented in a way that is maximally accessible, and your post could potentially be even more awesome than it already is!
I’m not suggesting you change anything at this point, just pointing stuff out.
^ But, that can be said of too many things. I don’t find it meaningful.
e.g. ‘It’s plausible that Harry Potter has not been written in the best possible way.’
Of course it’s plausible, but the consideration of its plausibility does not contribute to making better-informed decisions. It contributes no useful information!
Right. The real question is how much the post could improve given an hour’s effort; in other words, how much improvement could you buy for an hour of labor. And I’m suggesting that you could get a pretty good deal.