What do you think we could use to make arguments, if not logic?
Why should consciousness or aesthetics reduce to arguments of any kind? Why should they be amenable to formalization in agreement with a rather bizarre epistemic position?
It doesn’t justify itself in terms of an undeniable logical proof but in terms of a process that cannot be escaped and which is intrinsic to every aspect of human behavior.
That is an unfortunately narrow encapsulation of human nature.
Fuck off.
You mad bro?
Maybe you should re-calculate your emotions for a more reasonable outcome.
Why should consciousness or aesthetics reduce to arguments of any kind? Why should they be amenable to formalization in agreement with a rather bizarre epistemic position?
Allow me to rephrase: what do we use to distinguish between conflicting intuitions, if not meta-intuitions?
Why should consciousness or aesthetics reduce to arguments of any kind? Why should they be amenable to formalization in agreement with a rather bizarre epistemic position?
That is an unfortunately narrow encapsulation of human nature.
You mad bro?
Maybe you should re-calculate your emotions for a more reasonable outcome.
Allow me to rephrase: what do we use to distinguish between conflicting intuitions, if not meta-intuitions?
Sometimes a coin.