This elides the original argument by assuming the conclusion: that countermanding efforts remain cheap relative to the innovations. But the whole point is that significant shifts in costs associated with defense of a certain level can change behaviors and which plans and supply chains are economically defensible a lot.
Yeah, there can definitely still be imbalances/extra costs imposed on defenders but the point I’m making is that the projections people make are very often large over-estimates of what those costs will be.
This elides the original argument by assuming the conclusion: that countermanding efforts remain cheap relative to the innovations. But the whole point is that significant shifts in costs associated with defense of a certain level can change behaviors and which plans and supply chains are economically defensible a lot.
Yeah, there can definitely still be imbalances/extra costs imposed on defenders but the point I’m making is that the projections people make are very often large over-estimates of what those costs will be.