LW’s standards for rationality quotes vary, but in any case this does allow for the reading of endorsing allowing perceived evidence to override pre-existing beliefs, if one ignores the standard connotations of “skeptic” and “missionary”.
A quote that calls the holder of a potentially wrong belief a “skeptic” rather than a “believer” is more useful since it makes you more likely to identify with him.
I must be misinterpreting this, because it appears to say “religion is obvious if you just open your eyes.” How is that a rationality quote?
LW’s standards for rationality quotes vary, but in any case this does allow for the reading of endorsing allowing perceived evidence to override pre-existing beliefs, if one ignores the standard connotations of “skeptic” and “missionary”.
I guess, but that seems like a strange interpretation seeing as the speaker says he’s no longer “a skeptic” in general.
The point of rationality isn’t to better argue against beliefs you consider wrong but to change your existing beliefs to be more correct.
That’s a good reminder but I’m not sure how it applies here.
A quote that calls the holder of a potentially wrong belief a “skeptic” rather than a “believer” is more useful since it makes you more likely to identify with him.
Also judging from his other quotes I’m pretty sure that’s not what he meant...