This kind of inference feels like claiming the insolubility of the quintic because I solved a couple quintics numerically and the numbers look very weird.
I think it is more like the irreversibility of the trapdoor functions we use in cryptography. We are unable to prove mathematically they are secure. But an army of experts failing to break them is Bayesian evidence.
I think it is more like the irreversibility of the trapdoor functions we use in cryptography. We are unable to prove mathematically they are secure. But an army of experts failing to break them is Bayesian evidence.
Sidenote: Lol.