The OpenAI governance crisis highlights the fragility of voluntary EA-motivated governance schemes… So the world should not rely on such governance working as intended.
which to me is a different claim than questioning the merits of running companies based on the EA philosophy—it’s questioning an implementation of that philosophy via voluntarily limiting the company from being too profit motivated at the expense of other EA concerns.
Thanks. I was quoting Semafor, but on a closer reading of Tallinn’s quote I agree that they might have been misinterpreting him. (Has he commented on this, does anyone know?)
The actual quote by Tallin is:
which to me is a different claim than questioning the merits of running companies based on the EA philosophy—it’s questioning an implementation of that philosophy via voluntarily limiting the company from being too profit motivated at the expense of other EA concerns.
Thanks. I was quoting Semafor, but on a closer reading of Tallinn’s quote I agree that they might have been misinterpreting him. (Has he commented on this, does anyone know?)