Oops, I realized during editing that surprise is not so much what we should look for as learning, but I forgot to remove the instances of “surprise” from this post. Done.
In a day or two, I can better explain why I reject Dennett’s explanation, but for now it’s enough to note that it doesn’t dissolve the question at all.
Oops, I realized during editing that surprise is not so much what we should look for as learning, but I forgot to remove the instances of “surprise” from this post. Done.
In a day or two, I can better explain why I reject Dennett’s explanation, but for now it’s enough to note that it doesn’t dissolve the question at all.