Thank you for explaining this. I don’t think this is coherent, but now I understand what you mean.
Well, I find my approach perfectly coherent, unlike the alternatives that pretend to be objective :)
That’s valid.
Thank you for explaining this. I don’t think this is coherent, but now I understand what you mean.
Well, I find my approach perfectly coherent, unlike the alternatives that pretend to be objective :)
That’s valid.